Evaluation of Cytotoxic effect of Moringa peregrina seeds on Oral Cancer, CAL 27, Cell Line and Red Blood Cells Hemolysis / Evaluación del efecto citotóxico de las semillas de Moringa peregrina en el cáncer oral, CAL 27, líneas celulares y hemólisis de glóbulos rojos

Background: Moringa peregrina Forssk is a well-known plant in ethnomedicine due to its widespread uses in various diseases like cough, wound healing, rhinitis, fever, and detoxification. The plant seeds contain compounds that are cytotoxic to many cancer cells. During the therapeutic use of plants via the oral route, some compounds present in the plants may be cytotoxic to normal cell lines and red blood cells. Objective: This study was the first report of investigation of the cytotoxic profile on oral cancer, CAL 27, cell line, and hemolytic activities on human erythrocytes of Moringa peregrina seeds ethanolic extract (MPSE). Methods: MPSE was screened for its cytotoxic effect against oral cancer, CAL 27, cell line using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5,-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The toxicity of MPSE on human erythrocytes was determined by in vitro hemolytic assay. Results: MPSE showed significant anti-proliferative activity against oral cancer, CAL 27 cell line at lower concentrations with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 21.03 µg/mL. At 1,000 µg/ml of MPSE, the maximum hemolysis was found to be 14.3% which is within safer limit. Conclusions: This study revealed a potential anti-oral cancer of MPSE and provided a baseline for its potential use in oral cancer treatment with minimum hemolytic effect on human RBCs.

La Moringa peregrina Forssk es una planta muy conocida en etnomedicina debido a sus usos generalizados en diversas enfermedades como la tos, la cicatrización de heridas, la rinitis, la fiebre y la desintoxicación. Las semillas de la planta contienen compuestos citotóxicos para muchas células cancerosas. Durante el uso terapéutico de las plantas por vía oral, algunos compuestos presentes en ellas pueden ser citotóxicos para las líneas celulares normales y los glóbulos rojos. Objetivo: Este estudio fue el primer informe de investigación del perfil citotóxico sobre el cáncer oral, CAL 27, línea celular, y las actividades hemolíticas en eritrocitos humanos del extracto etanólico de semillas de Moringa peregrina (MPSE). Métodos: Se examinó el efecto citotóxico del MPSE contra la línea celular de cáncer oral CAL 27 mediante el ensayo con bromuro de 3-(4, 5-dimetiltiazol-2-il)-2, 5,-difeniltetrazolio (MTT). La toxicidad del MPSE sobre los eritrocitos humanos se determinó mediante un ensayo hemolítico in vitro. Resultados: MPSE mostró una actividad antiproliferativa significativa contra el cáncer oral, línea celular CAL 27 a concentraciones más bajas con un valor de concentración inhibitoria media máxima (IC50) de 21,03 µg/mL. A 1.000 µg/ml de MPSE, la hemólisis máxima fue del 14,3%, lo que está dentro del límite de seguridad. Conclusiones: Este estudio reveló un potencial anticancerígeno oral de MPSE y proporcionó una base para su uso potencial en el tratamiento del cáncer oral con un efecto hemolítico mínimo en los glóbulos rojos humanos.

DPYD genotyping and 5-fluoropyrimidine toxicity: An overview of systematic reviews protocol / Genotipado del gen DPYD y toxicidad de 5-fluoropirimidinas: Protocolo de una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas

Introduction: The increased risk of severe and life-threatening toxicity in patients with dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, under treatment with fluoropyrimidines, has been widely studied. An up-to-date overview of systematic reviews summarizing existing literature can add value by highlighting most relevant information and supports decision-making regarding treatment in DPD deficient patients. The main objective of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews on the association between germline variations in the DPYD gene and fluoropyrimidine toxicity.Methods and analysis: This protocol was developed following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist, and the overview of systematic reviews will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to 2023. Systematic reviews irrespective of study designs that analyze the association between germline variations in the DPYD and fluoropyrimidine toxicity will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR2 checklist (Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment, and data collection. Discrepancies will be solved by a third investigator.(AU)

Introducción: El incremento del riesgo de toxicidad grave y potencialmente mortal en pacientes con deficiencia de dihidropiridina deshidrogenasa (DPD) en tratamiento con fluoropirimidinas ha sido ampliamente estudiado. Una revisión actualizada de las revisiones sistemáticas publicadas, que agrupe la literatura existente, puede añadir valor al resaltar la información más relevante y respaldar la toma de decisiones con respecto al tratamiento en pacientes con deficiencia de DPD. El objetivo principal de esta revisión de revisiones sistemáticas es identificar revisiones sistemáticas publicadas sobre la asociación entre variaciones en el linaje germinal del gen DPYD y la toxicidad de las fluoropirimidinas. Métodos y análisis: Este protocolo se ha desarrollado siguiendo la lista de verificación de los Protocolos para Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis Preferidos (PRISMA-P), y la revisión de las revisiones sistemáticas se comunicará de acuerdo con la declaración PRISMA. Se realizará una búsqueda en PubMed, Embase, Scopus y la Biblioteca Cochrane desde su inicio hasta 2023. Se considerarán aquellas revisiones sistemáticas, independientemente de los diseños de estudio, que analicen la asociación entre variaciones en el linaje germinal del gen DPYD y la toxicidad de las fluoropirimidinas. La calidad metodológica se evaluará utilizando la lista de verificación AMSTAR2 (Herramienta de Medición para Evaluar Revisiones Sistemáticas 2). Dos investigadores independientes realizarán la selección de estudios, la evaluación de la calidad y la recopilación de datos. Las discrepancias se resolverán mediante un tercer investigador.(AU)

Genotipado del gen DPYD y toxicidad de 5-fluoropirimidinas: Protocolo de una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas / DPYD genotyping and 5-fluoropyrimidine toxicity: An overview of systematic reviews protocol

Introduction: The increased risk of severe and life-threatening toxicity in patients with dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, under treatment with fluoropyrimidines, has been widely studied. An up-to-date overview of systematic reviews summarizing existing literature can add value by highlighting most relevant information and supports decision-making regarding treatment in DPD deficient patients. The main objective of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews on the association between germline variations in the DPYD gene and fluoropyrimidine toxicity.Methods and analysis: This protocol was developed following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist, and the overview of systematic reviews will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to 2023. Systematic reviews irrespective of study designs that analyze the association between germline variations in the DPYD and fluoropyrimidine toxicity will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR2 checklist (Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment, and data collection. Discrepancies will be solved by a third investigator.(AU)

Introducción: El incremento del riesgo de toxicidad grave y potencialmente mortal en pacientes con deficiencia de dihidropiridina deshidrogenasa (DPD) en tratamiento con fluoropirimidinas ha sido ampliamente estudiado. Una revisión actualizada de las revisiones sistemáticas publicadas, que agrupe la literatura existente, puede añadir valor al resaltar la información más relevante y respaldar la toma de decisiones con respecto al tratamiento en pacientes con deficiencia de DPD. El objetivo principal de esta revisión de revisiones sistemáticas es identificar revisiones sistemáticas publicadas sobre la asociación entre variaciones en el linaje germinal del gen DPYD y la toxicidad de las fluoropirimidinas. Métodos y análisis: Este protocolo se ha desarrollado siguiendo la lista de verificación de los Protocolos para Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis Preferidos (PRISMA-P), y la revisión de las revisiones sistemáticas se comunicará de acuerdo con la declaración PRISMA. Se realizará una búsqueda en PubMed, Embase, Scopus y la Biblioteca Cochrane desde su inicio hasta 2023. Se considerarán aquellas revisiones sistemáticas, independientemente de los diseños de estudio, que analicen la asociación entre variaciones en el linaje germinal del gen DPYD y la toxicidad de las fluoropirimidinas. La calidad metodológica se evaluará utilizando la lista de verificación AMSTAR2 (Herramienta de Medición para Evaluar Revisiones Sistemáticas 2). Dos investigadores independientes realizarán la selección de estudios, la evaluación de la calidad y la recopilación de datos. Las discrepancias se resolverán mediante un tercer investigador.(AU)

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH–AEG–SEPD–SEOM–GETECCU / Manejo de las toxicidades digestivas secundarias al tratamiento con inhibidores de checkpoint: documento de posicionamiento de la AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.(AU)

El descubrimiento de los inhibidores de checkpoint inmunológicos (ICI) es uno de los logros más importantes en los últimos años en Oncología. Sin embargo, su uso en aumento ha conlllevado a un incremento de los efectos adversos inmunomediados (irAEs). Los eventos hepáticos y gastrointestinales incluyen la hepatitis, colitis y síntomas de tracto digestivo superior, que son de los irAEs más frecuentes, con incidencias entre el 2 y 40%, ésta última en paciente tratados con combo de ICI. Basados en la evidencia científica tanto de ensayo clínicos randomizados como de estudio de vida real, este documento de consenso aporta recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico, tratamiento y pronóstico de los efectos adversos hepáticos y gastrointestinales asociados con la inmunoterapia.(AU)

Enterocolitis and other immunotherapy and targeted therapy-related gastrointestinal manifestations: A review for gastroenterologist.

New oncologic treatments, particularly immunotherapy (IT), have revolutionized the treatment of advanced-stage malignant tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the main form of IT and act by increasing T cell activity and the organism's immune response against neoplastic cells. Targeted therapy is another form of IT that acts by inhibiting oncogenes or inflammation signaling and tumor angiogenesis pathways. However, these mechanisms of tumor destruction can interfere with the host's immune self-tolerance or with the mechanisms of epithelial tissue repair and predispose to immune system-mediated adverse events that can affect multiple organs, including the digestive tract. The gastrointestinal manifestations of damage caused by IT can range from low-grade mucositis to ulceration, and in some cases, necrosis and perforation. Any part of the gastrointestinal tract can be affected, but there is greater involvement of the small bowel and colon, with a pattern similar to that seen in inflammatory bowel disease. The most common clinical manifestation is chronic diarrhea. The differential diagnosis includes enteropathogenic infections, especially those caused by opportunistic microorganisms; adverse drug reactions; and other inflammatory and malabsorption disorders. Treatment is guided by damage severity. Mild cases can be treated with antidiarrheals and rehydration in the outpatient setting; moderate cases with hospitalization, systemic steroids, and temporary suspension of IT; and severe cases with immunosuppressants or biologic agents and definitive suspension of IT.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU.

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events (AU)

El descubrimiento de los inhibidores de checkpoint inmu nológicos (ICI) es uno de los logros más importantes en los últimos años en Oncología. Sin embargo, su uso en aumen to ha conlllevado a un incremento de los efectos adversos inmunomediados (irAEs). Los eventos hepáticos y gastroin testinales incluyen la hepatitis, colitis y síntomas de tracto digestivo superior, que son de los irAEs más frecuentes, con incidencias entre el 2 % y 40 %, esta última en paciente tratados con combo de ICI. Basados en la evidencia científica tanto de ensayo clínicos randomizados como de estudio de vida real, este documento de consenso aporta recomenda ciones sobre el diagnóstico, tratamiento y pronóstico de los efectos adversos hepáticos y gastrointestinales asociados con la inmunoterapia. (AU)

DPYD genotyping and 5-fluoropyrimidine toxicity: An overview of systematic reviews protocol. / [Artículo traducido] Genotipado del gen DPYD y toxicidad de las 5-fluoropirimidinas: protocolo de un resumen de revisiones sistemáticas.

INTRODUCTION: The increased risk of severe and life-threatening toxicity in patients with dihydropyridine dehydrogenase deficiency, under treatment with fluoropyrimidines, has been widely studied. An up-to-date overview of systematic reviews summarizing existing literature can add value by highlighting most relevant information and supports decision-making regarding treatment in dihydropyridine dehydrogenase deficient patients. The main objective of this overview is to identify published systematic reviews on the association between germline variations in the DPYD gene and fluoropyrimidine toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was developed following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist, and the overview of systematic reviews will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to 2023. Systematic reviews irrespective of study designs that analyze the association between germline variations in the DPYD and fluoropyrimidine toxicity will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR2 checklist (Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment and data collection. Discrepancies will be solved by a third investigator.

Calidad de vida y toxicidad financiera de los receptores de trasplantes de células madre hematopoyéticas en COVID-19 / Quality of life and financial toxicity of hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in COVID-19 / Qualidade de vida e toxicidade financeira dos transplantados de células-tronco hematopoéticas na COVID-19

Objetivo: evaluar y correlacionar la calidad de vida y la toxicidad financiera de pacientes adultos sometidos a trasplante de células madre hematopoyéticas durante el período de la pandemia de COVID-19. Método: estudio observacional, analítico, realizado con 35 pacientes en un hospital de referencia para trasplante en Latinoamérica. Para la recolección de datos, se utilizaron los cuestionarios Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy Bone Marrow Transplantation y el COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity. Para el análisis de los datos se utilizaron las pruebas de correlación de Spearman y Mann-Whitney. Resultados: la calidad de vida general durante la COVID-19 mostró un puntaje bajo (67,09/108) con mayor deterioro en el bienestar funcional (14,47/28), bienestar social (16,76/28) y preocupaciones adicionales (23,41/40). Los promedios del grupo alogénico fueron inferiores a los del grupo autólogo en todos los dominios, presentando diferencia significativa en relación a preocupaciones adicionales (p=0,01) y en el índice de evaluación del tratamiento (p=0,04). Se consideró que la toxicidad financiera tenía un impacto leve (22.11/44). Se observó una relación, aunque no significativa, entre la calidad de vida y la toxicidad financiera (p=0,051). Conclusión: la calidad de vida de la muestra fue baja; existe una correlación entre la calidad de vida y la toxicidad financiera, aunque no significativa. Cuanto mayor es la toxicidad financiera, menor es la calidad de vida.

Objective: to evaluate and correlate the quality of life and financial toxicity of adult patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: observational, analytical study, carried out with 35 patients in a reference hospital for transplantation in Latin America. For data collection, the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy Bone Marrow Transplantation and COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity questionnaires were used. Spearman and Mann-Whitney correlation tests were used for data analysis. Results: general quality of life during COVID-19 had a low score (67.09/108) with greater impairment in functional well-being (14.47/28), social well-being (16.76/28) and additional concerns (23.41/40). The means of the allogeneic group were lower than those of the autologous group in all domains, showing a significant difference in relation to additional concerns (p=0.01) and in the treatment evaluation index (p=0.04). Financial toxicity was considered to have a slight impact (22.11/44). There was a relationship, albeit not significant, between quality of life and financial toxicity (p=0.051). Conclusion: the quality of life of the sample was low; there is a correlation between quality of life and financial toxicity, although not significant. The higher the financial toxicity, the lower the quality of life.

Objetivo: avaliar e correlacionar a qualidade de vida e a toxicidade financeira dos pacientes adultos submetidos ao transplante de células-tronco hematopoéticas no período da pandemia de COVID-19. Método: estudo observacional, analítico, realizado com 35 pacientes em um hospital de referência para o transplante na América Latina. Para coleta de dados, utilizaram-se os questionários Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy Bone Marrow Transplantation e COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity. Na análise dos dados empregaram-se os testes de correlação de Spearman e Mann-Whitney. Resultados: a qualidade de vida geral, durante a COVID-19, apresentou baixo escore (67,09/108), com maior comprometimento nas funções bem-estar funcional (14,47/28), social (16,76/28) e preocupações adicionais (23,41/40). As médias do grupo alogênico foram inferiores às do autólogo em todos os domínios, apresentando diferença significativa em relação às preocupações adicionais (p=0,01) e ao índice de avaliação do tratamento (p=0,04). A toxicidade financeira foi considerada de impacto leve (22,11/44). Observou-se relação, ainda que não significativa, entre a qualidade de vida e a toxicidade financeira (p=0,051). Conclusão: a qualidade de vida da amostra foi baixa, logo há uma correlação entre qualidade de vida e a toxicidade financeira, embora não significativa. Quanto maior a toxicidade financeira, menor a qualidade de vida.

Guía internacional para una dosificación más segura de la clozapina en adultos mediante el uso de 6 titulaciones personalizadas de dosis basados en la etnicidad, la proteína C reactiva y los niveles de clozapina / An international adult guideline for making clozapine titration safer by using six ancestry-based personalized dosing titrations, CRP, and clozapine levels

Esta guía internacional propone mejorar los prospectos de la clozapina en todo el mundo mediante la inclusion de información sobre la titulación del fármaco en función de la ascendencia del paciente. Las bases de datos de reacciones adversas a medicamentos (RAM) sugieren que la clozapina es el tercer fármaco más tóxico en los Estados Unidos de América (EE. UU.) y que produce una mortalidad por neumonía en todo el mundo 4 veces mayor que la correspondiente a la agranulocitosis o la miocarditis. El rango terapéutico de referencia para las concentraciones séricas estables de clozapina es estrecho, de 350 a 600 ng/ml, con potencial de toxicidad y reacciones adversas más fecuentes a medida que aumentan las concentraciones. La clozapina se metaboliza principalmente por CYP1A2 (las mujeres no fumadoras requieren la dosis más baja y los hombres fumadores la dosis más alta). A través de la conversión fenotípica, la prescripción conjunta de inhibidores del metabolismo de la clozapina (incluidos los anticonceptivos orales y el valproato), la obesidad o la inflamación con elevaciones de la proteína C reactiva (PCR), pueden convertir al paciente en un metabolizador lento/pobre (MP). Las personas de ascendencia asiática (de Pakistán a Japón) o los habitantes originarios de las Américas tienen menor actividad de CYP1A2 y requieren dosis más bajas de clozapina para alcanzar concentraciones de 350 ng/ml. En los EE. UU. se recomiendan dosis diarias de 300-600 mg/día. La dosificación personalizada lenta puede prevenir RAM tempranas (incluidos el síncope, la miocarditis y la neumonía). La esencia de esta guía se fundamenta en 6 esquemas de titulaciones personalizadas para pacientes hospitalizados...(AU)

This is the Spanish translation of an international guideline which proposes improving clozapine package inserts worldwide by using ancestry-based: 1) dosing and 2) titration. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) databases suggest clozapine: 1) is the third most toxic drug in the United States (US), and 2) produces worldwide pneumonia mortality four times greater than that of agranulocytosis or myocarditis. For trough steady-state clozapine serum concentrations, the therapeutic reference range is narrow, from 350 to 600 ng/mL with the potential for toxicity and ADRs as concentrations increase. Clozapine is mainly metabolized by CYP1A2 (female non-smokers require the lowest dose and male smokers the highest dose). Poor metabolizer (PM) status through phenotypic conversion is associated with co-prescription of inhibitors (including oral contraceptives and valproate), obesity or inflammation with C-reactive protein (CRP) elevations. People with ancestry from Asia (Pakistan to Japan) or the Americas’ original inhabitants have lower CYP1A2 activity and require lower clozapine doses to reach concentrations of 350 ng/ml. Daily doses of 300-600 mg/day are recommended in the US. Slow personalized titration may prevent early ADRs (including syncope, myocarditis and pneumonia). The core of this guideline consists of six personalized titration schedules for inpatients...(AU)

Utilidad de la app Abeona Health® para la participación del paciente en la identificación de toxicidad inducida por quimioterapia según la clasificación CTCAE / Utility of the Abeona Health® app for patient participation in the identification of chemotherapy- induced toxicity according to the CTCAE classification

Fundamentos: Desde 2003, el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer (NCI) de los Estados Unidos de América ha sido uno de los líderes mundiales en la clasificación de los Efectos Adversos (EA). Actualmente, los teléfonos inteligentes permiten, entre otras muchas cosas, la monitorización de estos EA de la quimioterapia desde el domicilio para mejorar la seguridad y la calidad de vida de los pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar un análisis comparativo descriptivo del contenido de los EA de la aplicación Abeona Health® y la última versión de los CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Métodos: Se utilizó la app Abeona Health® y la guía CTCAE v5. Posteriormente, se analizaron los EA más recurrentes en el tratamiento quimioterápico, según la NCI y la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) y, finalmente, si los pacientes podían identificarlos. Resultados: El CTCAE v5 recoge 837 EA, donde 225 son signos y síntomas. El NCI clasifica cincuenta y cinco signos y síntomas como los más recurrentes, y la SEOM dieciséis, de los cuales quince coinciden con el NCI. La aplicaciónAbeona Health® dispone de siete EA, y todos se incluyen en el CTCAE v5. De estos siete, seis aparecen en las listas de EA más recurrentes del NCI y cuatro en la de la SEOM, todos ellos identificables por el paciente. Conclusiones: Laapp de Abeona Health® se considera adecuada para la participación del paciente en su autocuidado, si biense podrían ampliar algunos campos.(AU)

Bbackground: Since 2003, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the United States of America has been one of the world leaders in classifying adverse effects (AEs). Currently, smartphones allow, among many other things, the monitoring of these AEs of chemotherapy from home to improve the safety and quality of life of patients. The aim was to perform a descriptive comparative analysis of the AEs content of the Abeona Health® app and the latest version of the CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Methods: The Abeona Health® app and the CTCAE v5 guide were used. Subsequently, the most recurrent AEs in the existing chemotherapy treatment were analysed according to the NCI and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and finally, whether patients could identify them. Results: The CTCAE v5 (collects 837 AEs), where two hundred and twenty-five are signs and symptoms. The NCI classifies fifty-five signs and symptoms as the most recurrent, and the SEOM sixteen, of which fifteen coincide with the NCI. The Abeona Health® application has seven AEs, all included in the CTCAE v5. Of these seven, six appear in the NCI lists of most recurrent AEs and four in the SEOM list, all identifiable by the patient. Conclusions: TheAbeona Health® app is considered adequate for the patient participation in their self-care, although somefields could be expanded.(AU)

Predicción de toxicidad de la quimioterapia y radioterapia en el paciente oncológico quirúrgico

Fundamento la toxicidad asociada a los tratamientos de quimioterapia y radioterapia eleva la morbilidad y la mortalidad en los pacientes oncológicos. Objetivo diseñar un modelo predictivo de toxicidad de la quimioterapia y la radioterapia en el paciente oncológico quirúrgico. Métodos estudio analítico, de casos y controles, en pacientes oncológicos quirúrgicos que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión para la predicción de toxicidad preoperatoria, en el periodo enero a diciembre de 2022, en el Hospital Provincial Docente Oncológico María Curie, de Camagüey. Mediante el paquete estadístico Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, se seleccionó una muestra aleatoria de 334 pacientes, 197 sin toxicidad (grupo control) y 137 con toxicidad (grupo de estudio). Se realizó estimación de predictores de toxicidad mediante regresión logística binaria. Se seleccionó el modelo de mejor ajuste. Resultados el modelo en el paso tres predice un porcentaje global de 83,5 % con respecto a los valores observados. La sensibilidad resultó ser de 81,8; y la especificidad, 84,8. El modelo presentó buen poder discriminativo. Las variables en la ecuación fueron: hipertensión arterial, fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo y anemia. La comparación de la predicción con la realidad, mediante curva Receiver Operating Characteristic determinó un área bajo la curva de 0,901. Conclusión se obtuvo una función de regresión logística que permitió la estimación de la probabilidad de toxicidad en pacientes oncológicos quirúrgicos electivos, la cual proporcionó una herramienta para su predicción desde el preoperatorio.

Foundation the toxicity associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments increases morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Objective to design a predictive model of chemotherapy and radiotherapy toxicity in surgical cancer patients. Methods analytical, case-control study, in surgical oncology patients who met the inclusion criteria for the prediction of preoperative toxicity, from January to December 2022, at the María Curie Provincial Teaching Oncology Hospital in Camagüey. Using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, a random sample of 334 patients was selected, 197 without toxicity (control group) and 137 with toxicity (study group). Toxicity predictors were estimated using binary logistic regression. The model with the best fit was selected. Results the model in step three predicts an overall percentage of 83.5% with respect to the observed values. The sensitivity turned out to be 81.8; and the specificity, 84.8. The model presented good discriminative power. The variables in the equation were: arterial hypertension, left ventricular ejection fraction, and anemia. The comparison of the prediction with reality, using the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, determined an area under the curve of 0.901. Conclusion a logistic regression function was obtained that allowed the estimation of the toxicity probability elective surgical cancer patients, which provided a tool for its prediction from the preoperative period.

[Translated article] Influence of augmented renal clearance in the lower incidence of linezolid-related haematological toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of haematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced haematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Haematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in haemoglobin, and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of haematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentage diminution of all 3 parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and transfusion requirements were registered. RESULTS: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Haematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (P=.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (P=.051), anaemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (P=.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (P=.204). Median percentage of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (P=.333), while haemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (P=.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (P=.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least 1 adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had transfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of haematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients.

DPYD genotyping and 5-fluoropyrimidine toxicity: An overview of systematic reviews protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The increased risk of severe and life-threatening toxicity in patients with dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, under treatment with fluoropyrimidines, has been widely studied. An up-to-date overview of systematic reviews summarizing existing literature can add value by highlighting most relevant information and supports decision-making regarding treatment in DPD deficient patients. The main objective of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews on the association between germline variations in the DPYD gene and fluoropyrimidine toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was developed following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist, and the overview of systematic reviews will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to 2023. Systematic reviews irrespective of study designs that analyze the association between germline variations in the DPYD and fluoropyrimidine toxicity will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR2 checklist (Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment, and data collection. Discrepancies will be solved by a third investigator. REGISTRATION DETAILS: Registration number in PROSPERO: CRD42023401226.

Influencia de la hiperfiltración glomerular en la menor toxicidad hematológica inducida por linezolid / Influence of augmented renal clearance on the lower incidence of linezolid-related hematological toxicity

Objetivos linezolid es una oxazolidina frecuentemente implicada en el desarrollo de toxicidad hematológica, siendo el aclaramiento renal el mecanismo mayoritario en su eliminación. Se evaluó la influencia de la hiperfiltración glomerular en la toxicidad hematológica inducida por linezolid en pacientes con aclaramiento incrementado frente a pacientes con función renal normal. Material y métodos se diseñó un estudio observacional y retrospectivo en pacientes hospitalizados, tratados al menos 5 días con linezolid entre 2014 y 2019. Se compararon pacientes con aclaramiento de creatinina incrementado (≥130 mL/min) y normal (60–90 mL/min). Se definió la toxicidad hematológica como el descenso en plaquetas y hemoglobina del 25% y en neutrófilos del 50% frente a los valores basales. Se clasificó el grado de toxicidad según Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 y se comparó la incidencia entre ambos grupos mediante Chi-cuadrado y Fisher. Así mismo, se calculó el porcentaje de disminución de los 3 parámetros y su asociación mediante el test de Mann–Whitney y se registraron las interrupciones y transfusiones asociadas.Resultados se evaluaron 30 pacientes hiperfiltradores y 38 normofiltradores. El 16,66% de hiperfiltradores presentó toxicidad hematológica frente al 44,74% (p = 0,014). La trombocitopenia fue del 13,33 vs. 36,84% (p = 0,051), la anemia del 3,3 vs. 10,52% (p = 0,374) y la neutropenia del 10 vs. 23,68% (p = 0,204). La mediana del porcentaje de descenso plaquetario en hiperfiltradores frente a normofiltradores fue del −10,36 (−193,33–62,03) vs. 2,68 (−163,16–82,71) (p = 0,333), de hemoglobina 2,50 (−12,12–25,93) vs. 9,09 (−17,72–30,63) (p = 0,047) y de neutrófilos 9,14 (−73,91–76,47) vs. 27,33 (−86,66–90,90) (p = 0,093). El 10,5% con filtrado normal presentó toxicidad grado 3 o superior, el 2,6% interrumpió el tratamiento y el 5,2% requirieron transfusiones... (AU)

Objectives Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of hematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced hematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. Material and methods A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014–2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60–90 mL/min) were compared. Hematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in hemoglobin and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of hematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentaje disminution of all three parameters was calculated and compared by Mann–Whitney test and treatment interruption and tranfusion requirements were registered. Results 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Hematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (p = 0.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (p = 0.051), anemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (p = 0.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (p = 0.204). Median percentaje of platelets decrease in ARC patients was −10.36 (−193.33–62.03) vs 2.68 (−163.16–82.71) in reference patients (p = 0.333), while hemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (−12.12–25.93) vs 9.09 (−17.72–30.63) (p = 0.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (−73.91–76.47) vs 27.33 (−86.66–90.90) (p = 0.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least one adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had tranfusion requirements... (AU)

Toxicidad pulmonar secundaria a bleomicina. Reporte de un caso / Pulmonary Toxicity Secondary to Bleomycin. A Case Report

La toxicidad pulmonar por antineoplásicos es muy variable dependiente del grupo far-macológico; la bleomicina es uno de los medicamentos en los que se ha reportado este evento. Este citostático puede lesionar el endotelio pulmonar y el epitelio alveolar para llevar a un proceso inflamatorio y fibrótico del intersticio con repercusiones potencial-mente fatales.A continuación, se presenta un caso de enfermedad intersticial tipo neumonía organi-zada asociada a bleomicina en un paciente de 68 años con diagnóstico linfoma Hodg-kin clásico de tipo esclerosis nodular, con estudio imagenológico normal previo al tratamiento

Antineoplastic pulmonary toxicity is highly variable depending on the pharmacological group; bleomycin is one of the drugs in which this event has been reported. This cyto-static can injure the pulmonary endothelium and the alveolar epithelium to lead to an in-flammatory and fibrotic process of the interstitium with potentially fatal repercussions. The following is a case of interstitial disease type organizing pneumonia associated with bleomycin in a 68-year-old patient diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma of nodular sclerosis type, with imaging study prior to normal treatment

Influence of augmented renal clearance on the lower incidence of linezolid-related hematological toxicity. / Influencia de la hiperfiltración glomerular en la menor toxicidad hematológica inducida por linezolid.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of hematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced hematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Hematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in hemoglobin and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of hematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentaje disminution of all three parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and tranfusion requirements were registered. RESULTS: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Hematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (p = 0.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (p = 0.051), anemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (p = 0.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (p = 0.204). Median percentaje of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (p = 0.333), while hemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (p = 0.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (p = 0.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least one adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had tranfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of hematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients.

Variantes genéticas y actividad enzimática de la citidin desaminasa: relación con la toxicidad a la capecitabina y recomendación de ajuste de las dosis / Genetic variants and enzyme activity in citidin deaminase: Relationship with capecitabine toxicity and recommendation for dose adjustment

Objetivo: la capecitabina es un fármaco antineoplásico utilizado en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama y de colon que puede dar lugar a una toxicidad grave, llegando a ser mortal en algunos pacientes. La variabilidad interindividual de esta toxicidad es debida en gran medida a las variaciones genéticas en los genes diana y las enzimas de metabolismo de este fármaco, como la timidilato sintasa y la dihidropirimidina deshidrogenasa. La enzima citidin desaminasa (CDA), imprescindible en la activación de la capecitabina, también presenta diversas variantes asociadas con un mayor riesgo de toxicidad al tratamiento, aunque su papel como biomarcador aún no está claramente definido. Por ello, nuestro objetivo principal es estudiar la asociación entre la presencia de las variantes genéticas en el gen CDA, su actividad enzimática y el desarrollo de la toxicidad grave en los pacientes tratados con capecitabina, cuya dosis inicial se haya ajustado con base en el perfil genético del gen de la dihidropirimidina deshidrogenasa (DPYD). Método: estudio de cohortes observacional multicéntrico prospectivo, centrado en el análisis de la asociación genotipo-fenotipo de la enzima CDA. Tras la fase experimental, se desarrollará un algoritmo que permita determinar el ajuste necesario de las dosis para disminuir el riesgo de toxicidad del tratamiento en función del genotipo CDA, elaborando una guía clínica para la dosificación de la capecitabina en función de las variantes genéticas en DPYD y CDA. Con base en esta guía, se creará una herramienta bioinformática que genere el informe farmacoterapéutico de manera automática, facilitando la implementación del consejo farmacogenético en la práctica clínica. Esta herramienta proporcionará un gran respaldo en la toma de decisiones farmacoterapéuticas basadas en el perfil genético del paciente, incorporando la medicina de precisión en la rutina clínica. ... (AU)

Objective: Capecitabine, an antineoplastic drug used in the treatment of breast and colon cancer, can cause severe, even fatal toxicity in some patients. The interindividual variability of this toxicity is largely due to genetic variations in target genes and enzymes of metabolism of this drug, such as thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. The enzyme cytidine deaminase (CDA), involved in the activation of capecitabine, also has several variants associated with an increased risk of toxicity to treatment, although its role as a biomarker is not yet clearly defined.Therefore, our main objective is to study the association between the presence of genetic variants in CDA gen, CDA enzymatic activity and the development of severe toxicity in patients treated with capecitabine whose initial dose was adjusted based on the genetic profile of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gen (DPYD). Method: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study, focused on the analysis of the genotype-phenotype association of the CDA enzyme.After the experimental phase, an algorithm will be developed to determine the dose adjustment needed to reduce the risk of treatment toxicity according to CDA genotype, developing a clinical guide for capecitabine dosing according to genetic variants in DPYD and CDA. Based on this guide, a Bioinformatics Tool will be created to generate the pharmacotherapeutic report automatically, facilitating the implementation of pharmacogenetic advice in clinical practice. This tool will be a great support in making pharmacotherapeutic decisions based on the patient's genetic profile, incorporating precision medicine into clinical routine. Once the usefulness of this tool has been validated, it will be offered free of charge to facilitate the implementation of pharmacogenetics in hospital centers and equitably benefit all patients on capecitabine treatment. (AU)

Aluminum blood concentration in adult patients: effect of multichamber-bag versus hospital-compounded parenteral nutrition / Concentración sanguínea de aluminio en pacientes adultos: efecto de la nutrición parenteral tricameral frente a la nutrición parenteral elaborada en el hospital

Background: the administration of aluminum-contaminated parenteral nutrition (PN) leads to an accumulation of aluminum. The aim of this study was to assess blood aluminum concentrations (BACs) of inpatients receiving multichamber-bag (MCB) PN compared to those receiving compounded PN. Methods: available BACs were retrospectively gathered from patient charts of adult inpatients receiving PN from 2015 to 2020, and compared depending on the type of PN administered. Long-term PN patients, defined as ≥ 20 days of PN, receiving at least > 10 days of compounded PN, were compared to long-term patients receiving only MCB. Results: a total of 160 BACs were available from 110 patients. No differences were found according to type of PN (mean BAC: 3.11 ± 2.75 for MCB versus 3.58 ± 2.08 µg/L for compounded PN). Baseline total bilirubin, surgery and days with PN were related to higher BACs (coefficient: 0.30 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.42], 1.29 [95 % CI, 0.52-2.07], and 0.06 [95 % CI: 0.01-0.11], respectively). Regarding long-term PN, patients receiving only MCB (n = 21) showed lower BACs compared to the compounded PN (n = 17) [2.99 ± 1.55 versus 4.35 ± 2.17 µg/L, respectively; p < 0.05]. Conclusions: although there were no differences in BAC according to type of PN administered, in long-term PN, MCB PN was associated with lower BACs as compared to compounded PN. (AU)

Antecedentes: la administración de nutrición parenteral (NP) contaminada con aluminio conduce a su acumulación. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar las concentraciones de aluminio en sangre (CAS) en pacientes hospitalizados que recibieron NP elaboradas en el hospital o bolsas tricamerales. Métodos: se recogieron retrospectivamente las CAS disponibles de los pacientes hospitalizados con NP durante el período entre 2015 y 2020, comparándose los valores en función del tipo de NP administrada. Se comparan igualmente los valores de pacientes de larga duración, definida como ≥ 20 días de NP, que recibieron al menos > 10 días de NP elaborada frente aquellos de larga duración que recibieron solo NP tricameral. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 160 CAS de 110 pacientes. No se encontraron diferencias con respecto al tipo de NP (CAS media: 3,11 ± 2,75 para la tricameral frente a 3,58 ± 2,08 µg/L para la elaborada). La bilirrubina total basal, la cirugía y los días con NP se relacionaron con un mayor valor de CAS (coeficiente: 0,30 [IC 95 %: 0,18-0,42], 1,29 [IC 95 %: 0,52-2,07] y 0,06 [IC 95 %: 0,01-0,11], respectivamente). En la NP a largo plazo, los pacientes que recibieron solo NP tricameral (n = 21) mostraron una CAS menor en comparación con el grupo que recibió al menos 10 NP elaboradas (n = 17) [2,99 ± 1,55 versus 4,35 ± 2,17 µg/L, respectivamente; p < 0,05]. Conclusiones: aunque no hubo diferencias de CAS con respecto al tipo de NP administrada, en la NP a largo plazo, la administración de NP tricameral se asoció con CAS menores en comparación con la NP elaborada. (AU)

[Translated article] Genetic variants and enzyme activity in citidin deaminase: Relationship with capecitabine toxicity and recommendation for dose adjustment.

OBJECTIVE: Capecitabine, an antineoplastic drug used in the treatment of breast and colon cancer, can cause severe, even fatal toxicity in some patients. The interindividual variability of this toxicity is largely due to genetic variations in target genes and enzymes of metabolism of this drug, such as Thymidylate Synthase (TS) and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD). The enzyme Cytidine Deaminase (CDA), involved in the activation of capecitabine, also has several variants associated with an increased risk of toxicity to treatment, although its role as a biomarker is not yet clearly defined. Therefore, our main objective is to study the association between the presence of genetic variants in CDA gen, CDA enzymatic activity and the development of severe toxicity in patients treated with capecitabine whose initial dose was adjusted based on the genetic profile of the DPD gen (DPYD). METHOD: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study, focused on the analysis of the genotype-phenotype association of the CDA enzyme. After the experimental phase, an algorithm will be developed to determine the dose adjustment needed to reduce the risk of treatment toxicity according to CDA genotype, developing a Clinical Guide for capecitabine dosing according to genetic variants in DPYD and CDA. Based on this guide, a Bioinformatics Tool will be created to generate the pharmacotherapeutic report automatically, facilitating the implementation of pharmacogenetic advice in clinical practice. This tool will be a great support in making pharmacotherapeutic decisions based on the patient's genetic profile, incorporating precision medicine into clinical routine. Once the usefulness of this tool has been validated, it will be offered free of charge to facilitate the implementation of pharmacogenetics in hospital centers and equitably benefit all patients on capecitabine treatment.